Active/Active issues with SQL 2000 on Windows Server 2003

I'm planning on installing SQL 2000 on a 2 node Windows
Server 2003. I want to have both nodes to be active SQL
servers and they will both be available for each other in
the case of a Failure. Any issues regarding this tipe of
setup?
Is there a way to setup the second node without having to
create a new instance on the second node? I would prefer
only to have different Computer names?
Thanks
Christian Poupart
chpoupart@.ogilvyrenault.com
Each instance of a cluster requires a separate virtual server. IF you want
two SQL instances, you will need two virtual servers, each containing its
own instance.
Geoff N. Hiten
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Senior Database Administrator
Careerbuilder.com
I support the Professional Association for SQL Server
www.sqlpass.org
"Christian Poupart" <chpoupart@.ogilvyrenault.com> wrote in message
news:1f94f01c4588a$e49752b0$a601280a@.phx.gbl...
> I'm planning on installing SQL 2000 on a 2 node Windows
> Server 2003. I want to have both nodes to be active SQL
> servers and they will both be available for each other in
> the case of a Failure. Any issues regarding this tipe of
> setup?
> Is there a way to setup the second node without having to
> create a new instance on the second node? I would prefer
> only to have different Computer names?
> Thanks
> Christian Poupart
> chpoupart@.ogilvyrenault.com